Hayden v. 2K Games, Inc. et al
| James Hayden |
| 2K Games, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv02635 |
| December 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
Opinion and Order: For reasons set forth in this order, the Motion (ECF DKT # 93 SEALED & # 94 PUBLIC VERSION) of Plaintiff James Hayden for Partial Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part and the Motion (ECF DKT # 95 SEALED & # 101 PUBLIC VERSION) of Defendants 2K Games, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. for Summary Judgment is denied. Plaintiff's Motion (ECF DKT # 176 ) for Leave to File Sur-Reply is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/20/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
183
Opinion and Order DENYING Defendants 2K Games, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. to Exclude Testimony, Argument or Evidence Regarding the Expert Reports and Opinions of Michal A. Malkiewicz. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/22/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
178
Opinion and Order: For reasons set forth in this order, Plaintiff's motion Exclude the Expert Testimony of James E. Malackowski is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/15/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
175
Opinion and Order For reasons set forth in this order, Defendants 2K Games, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. motion 97 & 103 to Exclude Testimony, Argument or Evidence Regarding Justin Lenzo's Potential Market Opinion. The Motion is granted in part and denied in part. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/4/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
159
Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in this order, Defendants 2K Games, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. to Exclude Testimony, Argument or Evidence Regarding the Survey and Related Opinions of H. Tolga Bilgicer is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/15/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
158
Opinion and Order: For reasons set forth in this order, Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ian Bogost is granted in part and denied in part. (Related document Numbers 91 & 92 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/11/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
152
Opinion and Order For reasons set forth in this order, Plaintiff Hayden's motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dr. E. Deborah Jay is denied. (Related Documents 88 & 89 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/20/2022. (L,Ja)
|
|
Filing
50
Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court orders Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 33 and Interrogatory No. 14. The other three discovery requests at issue are denied. No further fact discovery will be allowed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 3/16/2020. (Related document 44 ) (S,S)
|
|
Filing
17
Opinion and Order. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in part Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Related doc # 14 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/21/2019. (H,CM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
