Green v. Gray
Petitioner: Charles T. Green
Respondent: David Gray
Case Number: 1:2018cv00056
Filed: January 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Ashtabula
Presiding Judge: James S. Gwin
Presiding Judge: William H. Baughman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/7/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, overrules petitioner's objections, adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and denies the petition. The Court also denies petitioner's motions for release under Rule 23 and to strike the government's opposition to his Rule 23 motion. (Related Docs. 1 , 8 , and 10 ) (D,MA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles T. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?