Young v. Harris

Young v. Harris

Petitioner:	George R. Young
Respondent:	Chae Harris
Case Number:	1:2018cv00411
Filed:	February 20, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Christopher A. Boyko
Presiding Judge:	Jonathan D. Greenberg
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 4, 2019	Filing 29 Opinion and Order. Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Related doc # 24 ) is denied. Petitioner's subsequent Motion to Amend his Petition and Supplemental Brief to the Petition (Related doc # 25 ) are denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 6/4/2019. (H,CM)
October 30, 2018	Filing 22 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Related doc # 19 ) and dismisses Petitioner's Petition as time barred. Petitioner's Motion to Amend Report and Re commendation (Related doc # 21 ) is denied. The Court finds an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right dire ctly related to his conviction or custody, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Rule 11 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 10/30/2018. (H,CM)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 4, 2019

Filing 29 Opinion and Order. Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Related doc # 24 ) is denied. Petitioner's subsequent Motion to Amend his Petition and Supplemental Brief to the Petition (Related doc # 25 ) are denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 6/4/2019. (H,CM)

October 30, 2018

Filing 22 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Related doc # 19 ) and dismisses Petitioner's Petition as time barred. Petitioner's Motion to Amend Report and Re commendation (Related doc # 21 ) is denied. The Court finds an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Since Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right dire ctly related to his conviction or custody, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Rule 11 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 10/30/2018. (H,CM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: George R. Young
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Chae Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?