Williamson v. Marquis

Williamson v. Marquis

Petitioner:	Michael Williamson
Respondent:	Dave Marquis
Case Number:	1:2018cv00472
Filed:	February 28, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey J. Helmick
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 17, 2021	Filing 55 Order Williamson is not entitled to relief from judgment. His motion reiterates some of the arguments I previously rejected, and which also were rejected by the Sixth Circuit. I deny his motion for relief from judgment. (Doc. No. 52). Further, I certify there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. (Related Doc # 52 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 5/17/2021.(S,AL)
January 7, 2020	Filing 46 Memorandum Opinion and Order: I overrule Williamson's objections, (Doc. No. 41), to Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation, (Doc. No. 34), and adopt the Report and Recommendation in full. I deny Williamson's motion for a stay a nd abeyance, (Doc. No. 8), as moot, and deny his motions to amend, (Doc. No. 37; Doc. No. 38; Doc. No. 43), and his motion for counsel, (Doc. No. 42), as lacking merit. I certify there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 34 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/7/2020. (S,AL)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 17, 2021

Filing 55 Order Williamson is not entitled to relief from judgment. His motion reiterates some of the arguments I previously rejected, and which also were rejected by the Sixth Circuit. I deny his motion for relief from judgment. (Doc. No. 52). Further, I certify there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. (Related Doc # 52 ). Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 5/17/2021.(S,AL)

January 7, 2020

Filing 46 Memorandum Opinion and Order: I overrule Williamson's objections, (Doc. No. 41), to Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation, (Doc. No. 34), and adopt the Report and Recommendation in full. I deny Williamson's motion for a stay a nd abeyance, (Doc. No. 8), as moot, and deny his motions to amend, (Doc. No. 37; Doc. No. 38; Doc. No. 43), and his motion for counsel, (Doc. No. 42), as lacking merit. I certify there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 34 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 1/7/2020. (S,AL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williamson v. Marquis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Williamson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dave Marquis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?