Keith v. Wainwright

Keith v. Wainwright

Petitioner:	Kevin Keith
Respondent:	Lyneal Wainwright
Case Number:	1:2018cv00634
Filed:	March 19, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Crawford
Presiding Judge:	Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 24, 2021	Filing 67 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, (R & R). After a careful de novo review of the R & R, the parties' arguments, Keith's Objection to theR & R, and all relevant materials in the record, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge&# 039;s R & R (ECF No. 56 ), as modified by this Order and hereby dismisses the Petition. The court also overrules the parties' Objections regarding the Magistrate Judge's partial expansion of the record, grants Keith's Second Motion to Expand the Record (ECF No. 59 ) and denies his Motion for Oral Argument (ECF No. 65 ). Finally, the court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could be taken in good faith, and the court hereby issues a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b). Related documents 56 , 59 , 65 . Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 9/24/2021. (R,Sh)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 24, 2021

Filing 67 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, (R & R). After a careful de novo review of the R & R, the parties' arguments, Keith's Objection to theR & R, and all relevant materials in the record, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge&# 039;s R & R (ECF No. 56 ), as modified by this Order and hereby dismisses the Petition. The court also overrules the parties' Objections regarding the Magistrate Judge's partial expansion of the record, grants Keith's Second Motion to Expand the Record (ECF No. 59 ) and denies his Motion for Oral Argument (ECF No. 65 ). Finally, the court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could be taken in good faith, and the court hereby issues a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b). Related documents 56 , 59 , 65 . Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 9/24/2021. (R,Sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith v. Wainwright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Keith
Represented By:	Calland M. Ferraro
Represented By:	James M. Petro
Represented By:	Zachary M. Swisher
Represented By:	Rachel G. Troutman
Represented By:	James R. Wooley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Lyneal Wainwright
Represented By:	Brenda S. Leikala
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?