Advance Wire Forming, Inc. et al v. Stein
| Advance Wire Forming, Inc., Advance Industries Group, LLC, AIG Holdlings, LLC and James Williams |
| Jeffrey Stein |
| 1:2018cv00723 |
| March 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
260
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in this Order, Mr. ONeill's Motion to Quash Subpoena (Doc. No. 244 ) is GRANTED. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/5/2022. (P,K)
|
|
Filing
225
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in this Order, Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference, Testimony, or Evidence, of any Kind, that Defendant Stein Allegedly Sexually Harassed Lisa Taylor (Doc. No. [ 185]) is granted; however, the Court will consider allowing Plaintiffs to introduce this evidence if Defendants open the door as set forth herein. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference, Testimony, or Evidence, of any Kind, of Plaintiffs' Claim that Defendant Stein Altered PPM's Inventory (Doc. No. 186 ) is granted. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 5/16/2022. (P,K)
|
|
Filing
223
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in this Order, Defendants' Motions in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument regarding Dismissed Counts (Doc. No. 188 ) and to Exclude Evidence regarding Alleged Misreprese ntations (Doc. No. 220 ) are granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Parol Evidence (Doc. No. 190 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiffs' Claim that Stein Intentionally Sabotaged a Plastics Order received by Plaintiff AWF (Doc. No. 187 ) is denied. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 5/11/2022. (P,K)
|
|
Filing
213
Memorandum Opinion and Orde as to Defendants' Motion in Limine Excluding as Evidence Any and All Medication Communications. (Doc. No. 184 .) Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/21/2022. (P,K)
|
|
Filing
163
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in this order, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim and Partial Summary Judgment as to their Complaint (Doc. No. 153 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on his Counterclaim (Doc. No. 152 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 151 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 8/25/2020. (L,Ja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
