Kimbro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Phillip Kimbro |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 1:2018cv01448 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Lorain |
| Kathleen B Burke |
| Sara Lioi |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant's Answer, the transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1, including but not limited to the schedule set forth in that Rule. Any requests for an extension of time shall be filed at least five days prior to the due date for filing. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 8/1/2018. (D,I) |
Order: [non-document] Plaintiff having paid the filing fee upon filing the Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #1 ) is MOOT. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 8/1/2018.(D,I)
|
| Filing 5 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 6/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List) (P,J) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ky) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2018: #2 Summons with correct Clerk of Court) (D,Ky). Modified corrected summons on 7/2/2018 (D,Ky). |
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (D,Ky) |
| Filing 2 Supplemental Security Income Benefits Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8776311. Filed by Phillip Kimbro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM-285) (Glazer, Michael) |
| Filing 1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Phillip Kimbro. (Glazer, Michael) |
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (D,Ky) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (D,Ky) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (D,Ky) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kimbro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Represented By: | Lisa Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phillip Kimbro | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Glazer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
