Covington v. Kanan Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Violet Covington
Defendant: Kanan Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a King Nut Company and Kanan Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01453
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2018 Filing 14 Answer to #1 Complaint, filed by Kanan Enterprises, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Arbitration Agreement)(Millisor, Richard)
August 21, 2018 Filing 13 Memorandum in Support of #12 Motion to Dismiss Complaint and to Compel Arbitration and/or to Stay Proceedings filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Joseph A. Valenza) (Millisor, Richard)
August 21, 2018 Filing 12 Motion to dismiss Complaint and Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Defendant Kanan Enterprises, Inc.. (Millisor, Richard). Modified text to add motion part on 8/22/2018 (S,SR).
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Consent of the parties to this case being transferred to the docket of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker for further proceedings. Order of Reference signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/6/18. (Related Doc. #8 ) (D,MA)
August 6, 2018 Filing 10 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Kanan Enterprises, Inc. on 7/16/2018, filed on behalf of Violet Covington Related document(s) #6 . (P,WL)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] Signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/6/2018 granting #7 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Kanan Enterprises, Inc. answer due 8/21/2018. No further extensions allowed. (L,Ja)
August 6, 2018 Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker assigned to case, pursuant to consent. Judge James S. Gwin terminated. Related document(s) #11 . (W,Jo)
August 2, 2018 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Kanan Enterprises, Inc.. (Millisor, Richard)
August 2, 2018 Notice by Clerk that Kanan Enterprises, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (S,SR)
August 1, 2018 Filing 8 Consent to exercise of jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge filed by All Defendants. (Millisor, Richard)
July 31, 2018 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time of 21 days or until August 27, 2018 to answer filed by Defendant Kanan Enterprises, Inc. Related document(s) #1 . (Millisor, Richard) (S,SR).
July 12, 2018 Service by Clerk. Alias Summons and Complaint addressed to Kanan Enterprises, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70173380000072665735. (P,WL)
July 10, 2018 Filing 6 Alias Summons issued to counsel for service upon Kanan Enterprises, Inc. (S,SR)
July 10, 2018 Filing 5 Praecipe for issuance of Alias Summons filed by Violet Covington. (Attachments: #1 Alias Summons)(Nilges, Hans)
July 10, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Filing Consent Form to Join in Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Violet Covington. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Thomas Draper)(Nilges, Hans)
July 9, 2018 Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk unexecuted upon Kanan Enterprises, Inc. c/o Anne T. Corrigan. Service attempted by certified mail, date unknown, filed on behalf of Violet Covington Related document(s) #2 . (P,WL)
June 29, 2018 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Kanan Enterprises, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70173380000072665667. (P,WL)
June 27, 2018 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Kanan Enterprises, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR)
June 27, 2018 Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (S,SR)
June 27, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,SR)
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 Collective Action and Class Action Complaint with jury demand against Kanan Enterprises, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8776528. Filed by Violet Covington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Consent of Violet Covington) (Nilges, Hans)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Covington v. Kanan Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kanan Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a King Nut Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kanan Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Richard A. Millisor
Represented By: James M. Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Violet Covington
Represented By: Hans A. Nilges
Represented By: Shannon M. Draher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?