Reo v. Chicken of the Sea International
Bryan Anthony Reo |
Chicken of the Sea International and Tri-Union Seafoods LLC |
1:2018cv01477 |
June 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Lake |
John R Adams |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Motion to remand to State Court (and supporting brief) filed by Plaintiff Bryan Anthony Reo. (Reo, Bryan) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (W,Jo) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Thai Union North America Inc. for Chicken of the Sea International filed by Chicken of the Sea International. (Butscha, Mark) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Court of Common Pleas of Lake County, case number 18-CV-000830 with jury demand. Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8782153. Filer has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:18-cv-01415. Filed by Chicken of the Sea International. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Butscha, Mark) |
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (W,Jo) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr.. (W,Jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.