Van Aken A1, LLC v. Continental Enterprises, LTD
| Van Aken A1, LLC |
| Continental Enterprises, LTD, Alan G Pearlman and Pedra Properties, LLC |
| 1:2018cv01586 |
| July 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S Gwin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Continental Enterprises, LTD, Alan G Pearlman, Pedra Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (W,Jo) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Van Aken A1, LLC dba Van Aken District. (Niehaus, James) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8799752.. Filed by Van Aken A1, LLC dba Van Aken District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Actual Confusion Email, #2 Exhibit B - Behrens-Letter, #3 Summons - Alan G. Pearlman, #4 Summons - Pedra Properties, LLC, #5 Summons - Continental Enterprises, LTD, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Niehaus, James) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (W,Jo) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (W,Jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
