Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Steris Corporation
Plaintiff: Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Defendant: Steris Corporation
Case Number: 1:2018cv01691
Filed: July 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 9/25/2018 at 09:00 AM at Chambers 18B before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting due no later than 12:00 p.m. on 9/21/2018. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 9/13/2018. (W,CM)
September 12, 2018 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent STERIS plc for Steris Corporation filed by Steris Corporation. (Auvil, Steven)
September 12, 2018 Filing 14 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand for Patent Infringement, Counterclaim against Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. filed by Steris Corporation. (Auvil, Steven)
September 11, 2018 Filing 13 Supplement to Motion for attorney Tamara Fraizer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8900910, - Affidavit of Tamara Fraizer in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, filed by Steris Corporation. Related document(s) #12 . (Auvil, Steven)
September 11, 2018 Filing 12 Motion for attorney Tamara Fraizer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8900910, filed by Defendant Steris Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Unsigned Affidavit of Tamara Fraizer, attorney will refile with original signature)(Auvil, Steven)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Tamara D. Fraizer for Steris Corporation. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. (Related Doc #12 ). Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 9/11/2018.(K,K)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Michael J. Kosma and Robert D. Keeler for Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. (Related Doc # #10 . #11 ). Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 8/17/2018.(K,K)
August 16, 2018 Filing 11 Motion for attorney Michael J. Kosma to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8861437, filed by Plaintiff Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing for Michael J. Kosma)(Cohen, Robert)
August 16, 2018 Filing 10 Motion for attorney Robert D. Keeler to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8861413, filed by Plaintiff Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing for Robert D. Keeler)(Cohen, Robert)
August 15, 2018 Filing 9 Attorney Appearance by Steven M. Auvil filed by on behalf of Steris Corporation. (Auvil, Steven)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #8 Stipulated Motion for extension of time until September 12, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Steris Corporation answer due 9/12/2018. Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 8/15/2018.(K,K)
August 14, 2018 Filing 8 Stipulated Motion for extension of time until September 12, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by Defendant Steris Corporation. (Ryland, Joshua)
August 14, 2018 Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Joshua M. Ryland filed by on behalf of Steris Corporation. (Ryland, Joshua)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr., for Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. (Related Doc #6 ) Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 8/7/2018.(K,K)
August 6, 2018 Filing 6 Motion for attorney Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8842321, filed by Plaintiff Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr., #2 Proposed Order)(Cohen, Robert)
August 1, 2018 Filing 5 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Steris Corporation on 7/23/2018, filed on behalf of Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. (Cohen, Robert)
July 23, 2018 Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Steris Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ky)
July 23, 2018 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (D,Ky)
July 23, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (D,Ky)
July 23, 2018 Notice to Attorney Wesley W. Whitmyer. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. Related document(s) #1 . (D,JJ)
July 20, 2018 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Karl Storz SE & Co. KG for Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. filed by Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. (Cohen, Robert)
July 20, 2018 Filing 2 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. (Cohen, Robert)
July 20, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint for patent infringement with jury demand against Steris Corporation. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8817782. Filed by Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Steris Corporation, #3 Exhibit A - US Pat. No. 8069420, #4 Exhibit B - Steris Image Routing Brochure) (Cohen, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Steris Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Represented By: Robert G. Cohen
Represented By: Robert D. Keeler
Represented By: Michael J. Kosma
Represented By: Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steris Corporation
Represented By: Tamara D. Fraizer
Represented By: Joshua M. Ryland
Represented By: Steven M. Auvil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?