Maclin v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District
Sherri Maclin |
Cleveland Metropolitan School District |
1:2018cv01916 |
August 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
James S Gwin |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Cleveland Metropolitan School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Cleveland Teachers Union Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Intramural Director Supplemental, #3 Exhibit C - Basketball Sponsor Supplement)(Jennings, Colin) |
Filing 6 Discovery Protocol Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18. (D,MA) |
Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18 setting a conference for 11/7/18 at 9:00 a.m., Chambers 18A. IMPORTANT: The parties are advised to carefully read this Order. The Court requires the attendance of (1) all parties, (2) lead counsel and (3) a representative with full authority for settlement purposes. (Attachments: #1 Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Local Civil Rule 30.1) (D,MA) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Package issued on behalf of Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18. (D,MA) |
Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18 granting defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time until 10/15/18 to file a response to plaintiff's complaint. The Court requires the filing of an answer. (Related Doc. #3 ) (D,MA) |
Filing 3 Motion for extension of time until October 15, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, filed by Defendant Cleveland Metropolitan School District. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hanna, William) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Cleveland Metropolitan School District. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (W,Jo) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (W,Jo) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (W,Jo) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Cleveland Metropolitan School District. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8864288.. Filed by Sherri Maclin. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Domozick, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Maclin v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sherri Maclin | |
Represented By: | Daniel D. Domozick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cleveland Metropolitan School District | |
Represented By: | Emily R. Spivack |
Represented By: | William M. Hanna |
Represented By: | Colin R. Jennings |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.