Maclin v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District
Plaintiff: Sherri Maclin
Defendant: Cleveland Metropolitan School District
Case Number: 1:2018cv01916
Filed: August 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: James S Gwin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2018 Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Cleveland Metropolitan School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Cleveland Teachers Union Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Intramural Director Supplemental, #3 Exhibit C - Basketball Sponsor Supplement)(Jennings, Colin)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Discovery Protocol Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18. (D,MA)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18 setting a conference for 11/7/18 at 9:00 a.m., Chambers 18A. IMPORTANT: The parties are advised to carefully read this Order. The Court requires the attendance of (1) all parties, (2) lead counsel and (3) a representative with full authority for settlement purposes. (Attachments: #1 Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Local Civil Rule 30.1) (D,MA)
September 6, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Package issued on behalf of Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18. (D,MA)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/6/18 granting defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time until 10/15/18 to file a response to plaintiff's complaint. The Court requires the filing of an answer. (Related Doc. #3 ) (D,MA)
September 5, 2018 Filing 3 Motion for extension of time until October 15, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, filed by Defendant Cleveland Metropolitan School District. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hanna, William)
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Cleveland Metropolitan School District. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (W,Jo)
August 20, 2018 Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (W,Jo)
August 20, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (W,Jo)
August 19, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Cleveland Metropolitan School District. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8864288.. Filed by Sherri Maclin. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Domozick, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maclin v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherri Maclin
Represented By: Daniel D. Domozick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleveland Metropolitan School District
Represented By: Emily R. Spivack
Represented By: William M. Hanna
Represented By: Colin R. Jennings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?