Trustees of the Painting Industry Funds, Inc. v. The Edward R. Flynn Co., Inc. et al
TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTING INDUSTRY FUND INC. and Trustees of the Painting Industry Funds, Inc. |
Robert Novotny, The Edward R. Flynn Co., Inc., Michael Chislow, BRB Glass Maintenance and Edward R. Flynn Co., Inc. |
1:2018cv01924 |
August 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Patricia A Gaughan |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Return of Service by Clerk unexecuted upon Robert Novotny. Service attempted by certified mail on 8/29/18 filed on behalf of Trustees of the Painting Industry Funds, Inc. Related document(s) #2 . (C,KA) |
Filing 7 FILING ERROR, see doc #8 for corrected entry. Returned Mail addressed to Party Robert Novotny. Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. Related document(s) #2 . (P,WL) Modified text 10/18/2018 (C,KA). |
Filing 6 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to BRB Glass Maintenance, Robert Novotny placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: ordinary mail. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of mailing for Robert Novotny) (H,D) |
Order [non-document]: Case Management Conference of 10/19/18 has been continued to 12/4/18 at 8:45 a.m. as Plaintiff has failed to perfect service. If service has not been perfected by the time allowed by law, case will be dismissed. Case Management Conference will be conducted by telephone with the Court initiating the call. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 10/11/18. (LC,S) |
Filing 5 Request to Clerk for service upon BRB Glass Maintenance, Robert Novotny by ordinary mail. filed by Trustees of the Painting Industry Funds, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Mailing for BRB Glass Maintenance, #2 Certificate of Mailing for Robert Novotny)(Winters, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference set on 10/19/2018 at 8:45 am to be held telephonically by Hon. Patricia A. Gaughan. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/05/18. (D,Ma) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to BRB Glass Maintenance, Receipt # 7018 0680 0000 8233 6231, Michael Chislow (6255), Edward R. Flynn Co., Inc., (6224), Robert Novotny (6248) all placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. (W,CM) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Trustees of the Painting Industry Funds, Inc. (Winters, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon BRB Glass Maintenance, Michael Chislow, Edward R. Flynn Co., Inc., Robert Novotny. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ky) |
Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (D,Ky) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (D,Ky) |
Notice by Clerk that Trustees of the Painting Industry Funds, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (D,Ky) |
Filing 1 Complaint against BRB Glass Maintenance, Michael Chislow, Robert Novotny, Edward R. Flynn Co., Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8869074. Filed by Trustees of the Painting Industry Fund Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Collective Bargaining Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Edward R. Flynn Co., #4 Summons BRB Glass Maintenance, #5 Summons Novotny, #6 Summons Chislow) (Winters, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.