Hall v. Madison Township Police Department et al
David D. Hall |
Madison Township Police Department, Lake County Board of Commissioners, Matthew J. Gosnik, Madison Township Trustees, Lake County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Lake County Sheriff's Department Deputies and Unknown Madison Township Police Officers |
1:2018cv01999 |
August 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Donald C Nugent |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Minutes of proceedings before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Case Management Conference held on 10/26/2018 with only counsel for Defendant present. No one appeared on behalf of Plaintiff although notified of date and time of case management conference. Case is assigned to the standard track. Discovery due by 3/31/2019. Status Conference set for 11/19/2018 at 10:30 AM in Chambers 15A before Judge Donald C. Nugent. If plaintiff does not appear or otherwise prosecute case, case to be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Court Reporter: None.) Time: 20 minutes. (M,S) |
Filing 7 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Lake County Board of Commissioners, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Smith, David) |
Filing 6 Marginal Entry Order granting Motion to continue (Related Doc #5 )case management conference. Case management conference re-scheduled to be held on 10/26/2018 at 9:00 AM at Chambers 15A before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 9/10/18.(R,JM) |
Filing 5 Motion to continue Case Management Conference filed by Matthew J. Gosnik, Madison Township Police Department, Madison Township Trustees. Related document(s) #4 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Magistrate's Order)(Cantor, Abraham) |
Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 10/22/2018 at 08:45 AM at Chambers 15A before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 9/6/2018. (M,S) |
Filing 3 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Lake County Board of Commissioners, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Smith, David) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lake County Common Pleas Court, case number 18CV001206 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8885991. Filed by Lake County Board of Commissioners, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Answer of Defendants Madison Township Police Department, Madison Township Trustees and Matthew J. Gosnik, #5 Case Management Order) (Smith, David) |
Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case, (S,SR) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,SR) |
Notice to Attorney Karen L. Hummel. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. Related document(s) #1 . (P,WL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.