Middleton v. Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Michael Middleton
Defendant: Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2018cv02056
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James S Gwin
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Marginal Entry Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/30/18 granting the parties' joint motion for leave to file under seal. (Related Doc. #13 ) (D,MA)
October 29, 2018 Filing 13 Joint Motion for leave to File Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Under Seal filed by Defendant Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting the Joint Motion for Leave to File Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Under Seal)(Chiricosta, Matthew)
October 16, 2018 Filing 12 Minutes of case management conference before Judge James S. Gwin on 10/15/18. (Court Reporter: H. Geizer; Time: 1 hr. 36 min.) (D,MA)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Stipulated Protective Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/5/18. (Related Doc. #10 ) (D,MA)
October 3, 2018 IMPORTANT: Notice [non-document] that the case management conference is reset to 10/15/18 at 12:30 p.m., Chambers 18A before Judge James S. Gwin. (D,MA)
October 2, 2018 Filing 10 Joint Motion for protective order filed by Defendant Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulated Protective Order)(Chiricosta, Matthew)
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/25/18 denying defendant's motion to excuse the personal attendance of its insurance representative and granting defendant's motion to reset the 10/3/18 case management conference. The Court requires the personal attendance of all parties, representatives with settlement authority, and lead counsel. IMPORTANT: Defense counsel shall confer with plaintiff's counsel, obtain mutual dates of availability for the weeks of 10/8/18 and 10/15/18, and shall provide said dates to chambers by close of business 9/27/18. (Related Doc. #8 ) (D,MA)
September 21, 2018 Filing 9 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.. (Chiricosta, Matthew)
September 21, 2018 Filing 8 Motion for leave (on behalf of Superior's liability insurer representative only) to attend the October 3, 2018 Case Management Conference by telephone, or, in the alternative Motion to reschedule the conference filed by Defendant Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.. Related document(s) #6 . (Chiricosta, Matthew) Modified text/added motion event on 9/21/2018 (M,S).
September 14, 2018 Filing 7 Preliminary Estimate/Budget of Amount of Fees and Expenses filed by Michael Middleton. Related document(s) #6 .(Voudris, Stephan)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/11/18 setting a conference for 10/3/18 at 9:00 a.m., Chambers 18A. IMPORTANT: The parties are advised to carefully read this Order. The Court requires the attendance of (1) all parties, (2) lead counsel and (3) a representative with full authority for settlement purposes. (Attachments: #1 Parties' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Local Civil Rule 30.1)(D,MA)
September 11, 2018 Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued on behalf of Judge James S. Gwin on 9/11/18. (D,MA)
September 10, 2018 Filing 4 Answer to Complaint filed by Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.. (Chiricosta, Matthew)
September 10, 2018 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Chubb Limited for Superior Beverage Group, Ltd. filed by Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.. (Chiricosta, Matthew)
September 10, 2018 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR)
September 10, 2018 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County, Ohio Common Pleas Court, case number CV-18-901974 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8898301. Filed by Superior Beverage Group, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Chiricosta, Matthew)
September 10, 2018 Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (S,SR)
September 10, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (S,SR)
September 10, 2018 Notice by Clerk that Superior Beverage Group, Ltd. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (S,SR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Middleton v. Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Beverage Group, Ltd.
Represented By: Matthew A. Chiricosta
Represented By: John R. Cernelich
Represented By: Patrick J. Dejelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Middleton
Represented By: Stephan I. Voudris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?