Simacek v. Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. et al
| Edward Simacek, II |
| Ronald Arthaud and Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02059 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Service of Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, Records and Things Directed to Mercer Transportation and Ronald Arthaud filed by Edward Simacek, II. (Paris, David) |
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Ronald Arthaud. (Leonetti, Frank) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Mercer Transportation Co., Inc.. (Leonetti, Frank) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lake County Common Pleas, case number 18CV001197 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8898703. Filed by Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Answer of Mercer, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Leonetti, Frank) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (S,SR) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
