Reo v. Palmer Administrative Services et al
| Anthony Domenic Reo |
| Michael Shaftel and Palmer Administrative Services |
| 1:2018cv02065 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment from the USCA for Sixth Circuit of receipt of #7 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 18-3924). Date filed in USCA 9/28/18. (H,SP) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals from the #6 Order Compelling Arbitration and Dismissing Case, filed by Anthony Domenic Reo. (Filing fee $505 paid, receipt number 0647-8931041) (Reo, Bryan) |
Filing 6
Minutes of Teleconference and Order. Teleconference held on 9/18/2018. For the reasons stated in the Order, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement falls within the broad authority of the Federal Arbitration Act. Accordingly, the Court grants the Motion to Compel Arbitration but denies the Motion to Stay Litigation. Doc #: #3 . Rather, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice. Should the arbiter determine that the case is not arbitrable, Plaintiff can refile the case here, alerting the Clerk of Court to the fact that it is a refiled case on the Civil Information Sheet. Based on this ruling, Plaintiff's Motions, Doc #: #4 , #5 , are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 9/26/2018.
|
| Filing 5 Motion to stay proceedings pending Bryan Anthony Roe's case in Lake County Common Pleas for declaratory judgment filed by Plaintiff Anthony Domenic Reo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bryan Reo v Palmer Complaint for Declaratory Judgment)(Reo, Bryan) |
| IMPORTANT: Notice [non-document] of Telephone Conference set for 9/18/2018 at 01:00 PM before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. (K,K) |
| Filing 4 Motion to strike #3 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Anthony Domenic Reo. (Reo, Bryan) |
| Filing 3 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation filed by Palmer Administrative Services, Michael Shaftel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Declaration of Mitchell N. Roth, #2 Exhibit B, Reo v. Titan Gas, LLC Complaint, #3 Exhibit C, Reo v. Charter Law, LLC Complaint, #4 Exhibit D, Reo v. Global Creditor and Collection Corp. Complaint, #5 Exhibit E, Reo v. Revenue Group Complaint, #6 Exhibit F, Reo v. Wilkins Research Services Complaint, #7 Exhibit G, Reo v. Northcoast Warranty Services Complaint, #8 Exhibit H, Reo & Reo v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., et al. Second Amended Complaint)(Carnahan, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (D,Ky) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lake County Court of Common Pleas, case number 18CV001254 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8899602.. Filed by Michael Shaftel, Palmer Administrative Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Summons to Palmer Administrative Services, Inc., #2 Exhibit B, Summons to Michael Shaftel, #3 Exhibit C, Complaint, #4 Exhibit D, Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carnahan, Benjamin) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case. (D,Ky) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (D,Ky) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
