George v. Shelton
Robert George |
Warden Ed Shelton |
1:2018cv02128 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Kathleen B Burke |
James G Carr |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order to Show Cause: Respondent shall show cause on or before sixty (60) days of the date of this order, why the petition should not be granted and the writ as prayed for issued. Petitioner to file traverse thirty (30) days thereafter and respondent to file response fifteen (15) days thereafter ( re #1 ). Judge James G. Carr on 10/10/18. (C,D) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2.Judge James G. Carr on 10/10/18. (C,D) |
Copy of Automatic Reference of Administrative Action, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #6 Order to Show Cause, #4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order mailed to Ed Shelton, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution, 1150 North Main Street, Mansfield, OH 44901 AndRobert George,680-299, Mansfield Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 788, Mansfield, OH 44901 on 10/10/18. Related document(s) #1 , #6 , #4 . (C,D) |
Filing 5 Order granting Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #3 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr on 9/21/18.(H,D) |
Copy of Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to Robert George, 680-299 at Mansfield Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 788, Mansfield, OH 44901 on 9/21/18. Related document(s) #5 . (H,D) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (W,Jo) |
Filing 3 Affidavit of prisioner filed by Petitioner Robert George. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Demand Statement)(W,Jo) |
Filing 2 FILED IN ERROR- Wrong Document Uploaded Refiled as #3 Affidavit of prisoner filed by Petitioner Robert George. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Demand Statement)(W,Jo) Modified on 9/17/2018 (W,Jo). |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Robert George. (W,Jo) |
Judge James G. Carr assigned to case, (W,Jo) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (W,Jo) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Copy of Petition, Administrative Track Initial Order and a blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Robert George on 9/17/18. (W,Jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: George v. Shelton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Robert George | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Ed Shelton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.