Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Denise Ruiz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2018cv02138
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: William H Baughman
Referring Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration c/o US Attorney's Office on 9/25/2018, by FedEx upon US Attorney General's Office on 9/27/18, by FedEx upon Office of Regional Chief Counsel on 9/28/18 filed on behalf of Denise Ruiz (Related document(s) #6 ). (H,SP)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr on 9/21/18. (H,D)
September 21, 2018 Filing 6 Original Summons issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (H,D)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr on 9/21/18.(H,D)
September 18, 2018 Filing 4 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 9/18/2018. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - Witness List, #2 Appendix B - Exhibit List)(P,J)
September 18, 2018 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (D,Ky)
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Denise Ruiz. Related document(s) #1 . (Margolius, Marcia)
September 18, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Denise Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons Regional Chief Counsel SSA, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 USM-285 US Attorney, #6 USM-285 Attorney General, #7 USM-285 Regional Chief Counsel SSA) (Margolius, Marcia)
September 18, 2018 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (D,Ky)
September 18, 2018 Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (D,Ky)
September 18, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (D,Ky)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Ruiz
Represented By: Marcia W. Margolius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By: Lisa Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?