Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Denise Bishop
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2018cv02149
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the US Attorney on 9/20/2018, upon the Attorney General via FedEx on 9/24/18 and upon the Regional Chief Counsel via FedEx on 9/25/18 filed on behalf of Denise Bishop Related document(s) #7 . (P,WL)
September 19, 2018 Filing 7 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshals for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ)
September 19, 2018 Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
September 19, 2018 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/19/2018. (D,JJ)
September 19, 2018 Filing 4 Supplement to Complaint, - Summonses, filed by Denise Bishop. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Hall, Julie)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/19/2018.(D,JJ)
September 18, 2018 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (W,Jo)
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Denise Bishop. Related document(s) #1 . (Hall, Julie)
September 18, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of SSA.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Denise Bishop. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Attorney General, #3 Summons - Regional Counsel, #4 Summons - US Attorney, #5 USM 285s - Regional Counsel/Attorney General/US Attorney) (Hall, Julie)
September 18, 2018 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (W,Jo)
September 18, 2018 Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (W,Jo)
September 18, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (W,Jo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Ruchi Vikram Asher
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Bishop
Represented By: Julie A. Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?