Forst v. American Greetings Corporation
| Michelle Forst |
| American Greetings Corporation |
| 1:2018cv02167 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Patricia A Gaughan |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2661 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Acknowledgement of receipt of certified copies of the USDC Northern District's docket sheet and the order remanding the case was received on 10/1/18 by the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. (W,Jo) |
| Filing 6 Certified copy of order of remand and docket sheet mailed to Cuyahoga county Court of Common Pleas with acknowledgment of receipt enclosed (Related document(s) #5 ). (H,SP) |
Filing 5
Order of Remand: The Court, having ACCEPTED the Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Remand (Doc. #4 ), hereby REMANDS this matter to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/27/18. (LC,S)
|
| Filing 4 Joint Proposed Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Remand filed by American Greetings Corporation. (Kirila, Jill) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by American Greetings Corporation. (Kirila, Jill) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas, case number CV 18 902490 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8919581. Filed by American Greetings Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kirila, Jill) |
| Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case, (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (S,SR) |
| Notice to Attorney Shennan Harris. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. Related document(s) #1 . (P,WL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Forst v. American Greetings Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Forst | |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. DeVito |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Greetings Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jill S. Kirila |
| Represented By: | Shennan Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
