I.A.M. National Pension Fund et al v. Union Eye Care Center, Inc. & Terminal Optical Laboratory
| Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund and I.A.M. National Pension Fund |
| Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory |
| 1:2018cv02197 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 30, 2018 to answer Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pixley, David) |
Order [non-document] granting Defendant's #7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 9, 2018 to answer Plaintiffs' Complaint. Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory answer due 11/9/2018. Approved by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 10/18/2018.(R,Sh)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until November 9, 2018 to answer Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory. (Pixley, David) |
| Filing 6 Attorney Appearance by David M. Pixley and Joseph D. Mando filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Pixley, David) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory on 9/27/2018, no delivery date on green card, date obtained from U.S. Postal Service website, filed on behalf of I.A.M. National Pension Fund; Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund (W,Jo) |
| Filing 4 Motion for attorney Joshua B. Shiffrin to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8930300, filed by Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund, I.A.M. National Pension Fund. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Joshua B. Shiffrin, #2 Proposed Order)(Stoper, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Motion for attorney Kathleen M. Keller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-8930289, filed by Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund, I.A.M. National Pension Fund. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Kathleen M. Keller, #2 Proposed Order)(Stoper, Richard) |
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiffs' Motions for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Kathleen M. Keller and Joshua B. Shiffrin for Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund and I.A.M. National Pension Fund. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. (Related Doc #3 , #4 ). Approved by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 9/27/2018.(R,Sh)
|
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70112970000075364136. (W,Jo) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Union Eye Care Center, Inc. and Terminal Optical Laboratory. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (W,Jo) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Union Eye Care Center, Inc. and Terminal Optical Laboratory. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8924226.. Filed by I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Stoper, Richard) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (W,Jo) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (W,Jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: I.A.M. National Pension Fund et al v. Union Eye Care Center, Inc. & Terminal Optical Laboratory | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Eye Care Center, Inc & Terminal Optical Laboratory | |
| Represented By: | Joseph D. Mando |
| Represented By: | David M. Pixley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the I.A.M. National Pension Fund | |
| Represented By: | Joyce Goldstein |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Stoper |
| Represented By: | Kathleen M. Keller |
| Represented By: | Joshua B. Shiffrin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: I.A.M. National Pension Fund | |
| Represented By: | Joyce Goldstein |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Stoper |
| Represented By: | Kathleen M. Keller |
| Represented By: | Joshua B. Shiffrin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
