Acosta v. Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Plaintiff: Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO Local 72 and Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Case Number: 1:2018cv02247
Filed: September 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Solomon Oliver
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70150640000293372795. (S,SR)
November 9, 2018 Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO on 11/5/2018, filed on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Green Card with signature and delivery date)(Bacchus, Renee)
October 18, 2018 Filing 3 Return of Service by FedEx Courier executed upon Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO on 10/17/2018, filed on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FedEx Delivery Confirmation)(Bacchus, Renee)
October 1, 2018 Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (D,Ky)
October 1, 2018 Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (D,Ky)
October 1, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (D,Ky)
September 28, 2018 Filing 1 Complaint against Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO. Filing fee exempt. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:18-mc-00097-JG. Filed by R. Alexander Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Bacchus, Renee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acosta v. Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta
Represented By: Renee A. Bacchus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Represented By: Renee A. Bacchus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO Local 72
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Local 72 American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?