Lynch v. Lake County et al
Plaintiff: Jean Lynch
Defendant: Lake County and Lake County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 1:2018cv02332
Filed: October 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #9 Joint Motion for Extension of Time until Dec. 12, 2018 to complete testing. The parties' Joint Status Report is now due by 12:00PM on Dec. 17, 2018. The follow-up teleconference is rescheduled to Dec. 19, 2018 at 2:00PM. Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 12/4/2018.(W,CM)
December 3, 2018 Filing 9 Joint Motion for extension of time until December 12, 2018 to complete testing and resetting the report date and status conference date filed by Lake County, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Hannon, Tami)
November 2, 2018 Minutes of proceedings [non-document] On Nov. 2, 2018, the Court held a Case Management Conference attended telephonically by Plaintiff Jean Lynch and her counsel Peter C. Mapley, and attended in-person by Defendants' representatives Al Francis, Daniel A. Dunlap, and Frank J. Leonbruno, and Defendants' counsel Tami Z. Hannon. The Court discussed the case with the parties. Given Plaintiff's desire for reinstatement, the Court directed Plaintiff, with guidance from her doctor, to obtain the recommended respirator by Nov. 30, 2018. The parties are then to conduct tests during the week of Dec. 3, 2018 to see whether Plaintiff (1) still has an allergic reaction to the paint and/or (2) cannot communicate effectively while wearing the respirator. The parties are to submit a Joint Status Report of their findings by 12:00PM on Dec. 10, 2018. The Court scheduled a follow-up teleconference for Dec. 11, 2018 at 9:30AM. Both counsel and parties are required to attend the teleconference. (Court Reporter: n/a.) Time: 1 hour. (K,K)
October 31, 2018 Filing 8 Initial Disclosures filed by Jean Lynch. (Mapley, Peter)
October 31, 2018 Filing 7 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Jean Lynch. (Mapley, Peter)
October 30, 2018 Filing 6 Initial Disclosures filed by Lake County, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Hannon, Tami)
October 11, 2018 Filing 5 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Lake County, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Hannon, Tami)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 12/6/2018 at 09:00 AM at Chambers 18B before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting due no later than 12:00 p.m. on 12/4/2018. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 10/10/2018. (K,K)
October 10, 2018 IMPORTANT: Notice [non-document] Case Management Conference reset for 11/2/2018 at 10:00 AM at Chambers 18B before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting now due no later than 12:00 p.m. on 10/31/2018. (K,K)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #3 Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by David M. Smith. Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 10/10/2018.(K,K)
October 9, 2018 Filing 3 Motion to Withdraw Attorney David M. Smith as Counsel filed by Lake County, Lake County Sheriff's Department. (Hannon, Tami)
October 9, 2018 Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR)
October 9, 2018 Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (S,SR)
October 9, 2018 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (S,SR)
October 8, 2018 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lake County Common Pleas Court, case number 18CV000595 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8946452.. Filed by Lake County Sheriff's Department, Lake County. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Answer of Defendants, #5 Court Notice of Case Management Conference on 8/8/18, #6 Motion to Continue Case Management Conference, #7 Hearing Notice - Case Management Conf reset to 8/1/18, #8 Notice of Service of Discovery Responses, #9 Court Journal Entry, #10 Notice of Service of Discovery Requests, #11 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint) (Hannon, Tami)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lynch v. Lake County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lake County
Represented By: Tami Z. Hannon
Represented By: David M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lake County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: Tami Z. Hannon
Represented By: David M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Lynch
Represented By: Peter C. Mapley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?