Vanauken et al v. Severino Construction, Inc. et al
| Chad Vanauken and Keri Vanauken |
| J Severino Construction, Inc., Severino Construction, Inc., Lauren A. Bugansky, John Does #1-40, Robison Trucking, Inc. and Dennis M. Berg |
| 1:2018cv02525 |
| November 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| James S Gwin |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FILING ERROR: The Court consolidates the instant case with Case No. 1:18CV01989. All future filings shall be made in Case No. 1:18CV01989. (see Order to Consolidate #5 . First Amended complaint against Lauren A. Bugansky, J. Severino Construction, Inc., Severino Construction, Inc. and adding new party defendant(s) Robison Trucking, Inc. and Dennis M. Berg. Filed by Kathy Stein, Joseph M. Stein. (Attachments: #1 Summons) Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-01989-JG, 1:18-cv-02525-JG (Lebovitz, Jordan) |
| Filing 8 Original Summons issued to Counsel for service upon Dennis M. Berg, Lauren A. Bugansky, J Severino Construction, Inc., Robison Trucking, Inc. (at Iowa Avenue address and S. Houser Street address) Severino Construction, Inc. (L,Ja) |
| Filing 7 Supplement to Amended complaint, - Request for Issuance of Summons, filed by Chad Vanauken, Keri Vanauken. Related document(s)(6 in 1:18-cv-02525-JG, 21 in 1:18-cv-01989-JG). (Melick, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 Amended complaint against Lauren A. Bugansky, J Severino Construction, Inc., Severino Construction, Inc., adding new party defendant(s) Robison Trucking, Dennis Berg, John Does #1-40. Filed by Chad Vanauken, Keri Vanauken. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-01989-JG, 1:18-cv-02525-JG (Melick, Gregory) |
Filing 5
Order to Consolidate signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/8/18. The Court consolidates the instant case with Case No. 1:18CV01989. All future filings shall be made in Case No. 1:18CV01989. (D,MA)
|
| IMPORTANT: Notice [non-document] that the Court shall hold a consolidated case management conference with that of Case No. 18cv1989 Stein v. Severino Construction, Inc., et al on 11/8/18 at 8:00 a.m., Chambers 18A. (D,MA) |
|
Filing 4
Order of Reassignment. This case is returned to the Clerk for reassignment as related to 1:18CV1989 to Judge James S. Gwin for all further proceedings. Judges Christopher A. Boyko and James S. Gwin on 11/5/2018. (H,CM)
|
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, Judge Christopher A. Boyko terminated. (S,SR) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to Complaint, - Civil Cover Sheet (corrected), filed by All Plaintiffs. Related document(s) #1 . (Melick, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8988341. Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:18-cv-01989. Filed by Chad Vanauken, Keri Vanauken. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-report, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summonses) (Melick, Gregory) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (S,SR) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
