C & C Contractors LLC v. Mack Concrete, Inc.
| C & C Contractors LLC |
| Mack Concrete, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02569 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's #11 Motion for extension of time until 01/24/2019 to file response/reply to Defendant's #9 Motion for partial judgment on the pleadings . Approved by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 1/2/2019.(R,Sh)
|
| Filing 11 Motion for extension of time until 01/24/2019 to file response/reply to #9 Motion for partial judgment on the pleadings filed by Plaintiff C & C Contractors LLC. Related document(s) #9 . (Bain, Richard) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (R,Sh) |
| Filing 9 Motion for partial judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendant Mack Concrete, Inc. (Scheaf, O.) |
|
Filing 8
Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 1/9/2019 at 03:00 PM at Chambers 17A before Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. A report of the parties' planning meeting shall be jointly signed and submitted to the Clerk forfiling not less than 3 days before the CMC. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 12/4/2018. (R,Sh)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Mack Concrete, Inc.. (Scheaf, O.) |
| Notice by Clerk that Mack Concrete, Inc. failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (B,R) |
| Filing 6 Answer to Complaint filed by Mack Concrete, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Scheaf, O.) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Mack Concrete, Inc. c/o Judson Schaef, III on 11/14/18 (no date on card, retrieved from USPS website), filed on behalf of C & C Contractors LLC Related document(s) #3 . (P,WL) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Mack Concrete, Inc. c/o Betsy Mack Nespeca at Valley City address on 11/9/2018, filed on behalf of C & C Contractors LLC Related document(s) #3 . (P,WL) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Mack Concrete, Inc. at Columbus, OH address and Valley City, OH address. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by C & C Contractors. (O'Rourke, R.) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Breach of Contract, Negligence and Fraud against Mack Concrete, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8998513. Filed by C & C Contractors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Price Quote, #2 Exhibit B-Letter from C & C Contractors, #3 Exhibit C-Letter from Mack Concrete, #4 Exhibit D-EmailCorrespondence, #5 Exhibit E-Invoices, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons Besty Mack, #8 Summons O. Judson) (O'Rourke, R.) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (B,R) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Mack Concrete, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70172680000004959451 (Valley City Address); Receipt #70172680000004959444 (Columbus Adress). (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
