Savoca v. O'Neill et al
Thomas James Savoca |
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek, Traders Bank, Mary Stanley, Ripley Police Dept, Ripley WV, Sean R. O'Neill, Carlos Santos, Scott Wilson and Susan Arnold |
1:2019cv00014 |
January 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Thomas James Savoca. (Attachments: #1 transactions)(S,SR) |
Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Thomas James Savoca. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet -second page, #2 Exhibit A-Letter, #3 Exhibit B-Appeals documents, #4 Exhibit C-docket excerpt, #5 envelope) (S,SR) |
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Copy of #1 Complaint and a blank civil cover sheet, mailed to Thomas James Savoca #20970008 at USP Hazelton P.O. Box 2000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 on 1/3/2019. (S,SR) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (S,SR) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.