International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 1:2019cv00177 |
| January 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred to District of Nebraska on 1/31/2019 (Related document(s) #4 ). (H,SP) |
| Case transferred from Ohio Northern has been opened in District of Nebraska as case 8:19-cv-00050 (S,HR) |
Filing 4
Order of Transfer. For the reasons stated in the Order, the Court hereby GRANTS the Unopposed Motion and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to transfer the case to the U.S. Court for the District of Nebraska. Additionally, the teleconference presently scheduled on January 30, 2019 is hereby CANCELLED. Related document #3 . Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 1/29/2019. (W,CM)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed Motion to transfer venue filed by Petitioner International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division. (McKinley, Shawn) |
| IMPORTANT: Notice [non-document] of Telephone Conference set for 1/30/2019 at 01:00 PM in to be held before Judge Dan Aaron Polster. (W,CM) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (S,SR) |
| Filing 1 Petition to enforce awards of the public law board no. 7861 against Union Pacific Railroad Company. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9108978. Filed by International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division. (Attachments: #1 Final Award, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (McKinley, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division | |
| Represented By: | Shawn M. McKinley |
| Represented By: | Kevin C. Brodar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
