Twumasi-Ankrah v. Checkr, Inc.
| Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah |
| Checkr, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00204 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Donald C Nugent |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order [non-document] granting Motion to continue (Related Doc #8 ) case management conference. The case management conference is re-scheduled to be held on 4/11/2019 at 09:00 AM at Chambers 15A before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/14/19.(R,JM)
|
| Filing 8 Motion to continue Case Management Conference filed by Plaintiff Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lemberg, Sergei) |
| Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 3/28/2019 at 09:15 AM at Chambers 15A before Judge Donald C. Nugent. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 2/28/19. (R,JM) |
|
Order [non-document] granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until March 29, 2019. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 2/26/19.(R,JM)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until March 29, 2019 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Checkr, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Krol, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 Supplement to #3 Return of Service Executed - Summons with Proof of Service page, filed by Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR. Duplicate of #3 . Return of Service by personal service executed upon Checkr, Inc. on 2/6/2019, filed on behalf of Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah (Lemberg, Sergei) Modified to note filing error on 2/11/2019 (S,HR). |
| Filing 3 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Checkr, Inc. on 2/6/2019, filed on behalf of Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah. (Lemberg, Sergei) Modified on 2/11/2019 (S,HR). |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Checkr, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Judge Donald C. Nugent assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Checkr, Inc. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9113495. Filed by Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Twumasi-Ankrah v. Checkr, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Checkr, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan H. Krol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah | |
| Represented By: | Sergei Lemberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
