CNH Industrial Capital America LLC v. Medina Tractor Sales Company et al
| CNH Industrial Capital America LLC |
| Brent Hollopeter, Reed Hollopeter and Medina Tractor Sales Company |
| 1:2019cv00319 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Benita Y Pearson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Reed Hollopeter on 2/15/2019, filed on behalf of CNH Industrial Capital America LLC (Tarney, Tyler) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Brent Hollopeter, Reed Hollopeter, Medina Tractor Sales Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (S,SR) |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case, (S,SR) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Breach of Contract, Breach of Guarenty, Conversion against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9142291. Filed by CNH Industrial Capital America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 B. Hollopeter Summons, #3 R. Hollopeter Summons, #4 Medina Tractor Summons) (Tarney, Tyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
