Harvey v. Social Security Administration
Ulysses Harvey |
Social Security Administration |
1:2019cv00499 |
March 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Christopher A Boyko |
James R Knepp |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 425 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by FedEx executed upon Social Security Administration, Office of the Regional Chief, U.S. Attorney NDOH, and U.S. Attorney General on 3/8/2019 filed on behalf of Ulysses Harvey. Related document(s) #1 , #6 . (R,Ke) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant is granted a maximum of 60 days after the complaint has been served to file an answer and transcript. Within 30 days of the filing of the answer and transcript, Plaintiff shall file its Brief on the Merits. In the event Plaintiff's brief is not filed within 30 days of the answer, case may be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. Defendant shall file its Brief on the Merits within 30 days thereafter. Plaintiff's Reply Brief, if any, shall be filed within 14 days of filing of Defendant's Brief. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II on 3/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(S,JM) |
Filing 6 Original Summons issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney General, and Office of the U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (S,JM) |
Filing 5 Order granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II on 3/8/2019.(S,JM) |
Filing 4 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (B,R) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Compliance filed by Ulysses Harvey. (Braun, Katherine) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ulysses Harvey. (Braun, Katherine) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Social Security Administration.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ulysses Harvey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 USM-285, #7 USM-285, #8 USM-285) (Braun, Katherine) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (B,R) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (B,R) |
Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harvey v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ulysses Harvey | |
Represented By: | Katherine M. Braun |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.