Gibson et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association
| Kim Gibson and Lawrence Farrell |
| U.S. Bank, National Association |
| 1:2019cv00538 |
| March 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon U.S. Bank, National Association. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against U.S. Bank, National Association. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9192194. Filed by Kim Gibson, Lawrence Farrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US Bank Proof of Designated Address, #2 Exhibit US Bank Class Actions, #3 Exhibit 2019 02 05 NOE Insufficient Response to RESPA RFI, #4 Exhibit 2019 02 15 Mtg Statement, #5 Exhibit 2019 02 28 NOE Insufficient Response to RESPA RFI, #6 Exhibit 2019 02 20 RFI TILA Letter, #7 Exhibit 2019 02 20 RFI Loss Mitigation, #8 Exhibit 2019 02 20 RFI RESPA Letter, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons) (Dann, Marc) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
