Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, et al.
Jodi Fleming |
Rick Plant, James Tench, Ohio Bell Telephone Company, CEO Randall L. Stephenson, Janice King, Sandra Moreno, Willilam Blase, Jr. and William A. Blase, Jr. |
1:2019cv00994 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 12131 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledgment from the USCA for Sixth Circuit of receipt of #11 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 19-3567). Date filed in USCA 6/14/19. (H,SP) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals from the #9 Memorandum of Opinion and Order and #10 Judgment Entry of 5/16/19, filed by Jodi Fleming. Filing fee not paid. (Attachments: #1 Application to proceed without prepayment of fees - Returned to appellant with instructions to file in Circuit Court) (H,SP) |
Filing 10 Judgment Entry. For the reasons set forth in the Court's #9 Memorandum of Opinion and Order, this action is dismissed. Plaintiff is ordered to pay to the Defendants the sum of $400.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Payment shall be made to the Defendants' counsel at their law office address. In addition, Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Compliance with the Court indicating that payment has been made as prescribed by the Order. Plaintiff is permanently enjoined from filing additional documents in this case or in prior cases she initiated in this Court, and is reminded that she is permanently enjoined from filing any new action in either state or federal court, without seeking and obtaining leave of court as set forth in this Court's prior Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/16/2019. (K,K) |
Filing 9 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated in the Order, this action is dismissed. Plaintiff is ordered to pay to the Defendants the sum of $400.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Payment shall be made to the Defendants' counsel at their law office address. In addition, Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Compliance with the Court indicating that payment has been made as prescribed by the Order. Plaintiff is permanently enjoined from filing additional documents in this case or in prior cases she initiated in this Court, and is reminded that she is permanently enjoined from filing any new action in either state or federal court, without seeking and obtaining leave of court as set forth in this Court's prior Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/16/2019. (K,K) |
Copy of #9 Memorandum of Opinion and Order and #10 Judgment mailed to Jodi Fleming at 22817 Jennings Street, Warrensville Heights, OH 44128 on 5/16/2019. (K,K) |
Filing 8 Motion for clarification filed by Plaintiff Jodi Fleming. Related document(s) #7 . (S,KM) |
Filing 7 Motion for extension of time until 14 days to answer post removal and dismissal filed by Plaintiff Jodi Fleming. Related document(s) #1 , #4 . (S,KM) |
Filing 6 Motion to strike any motions post removal filed by Plaintiff Jodi Fleming. (S,KM) |
Filing 5 Objection to Notice of Removal filed by Jodi Fleming. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Email to Counsel) (S,KM) |
Filing 4 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Motion for sanctions, and, Motion for status conference filed by William A. Blase, Jr., Janice King, Sandra Moreno, Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Rick Plant, Randall L. Stephenson, James Tench. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Charge, #3 Exhibit B - Docket, #4 Exhibit C - Order, #5 Exhibit D - Complaint, #6 Exhibit E - Docket, #7 Exhibit F - Order, #8 Exhibit G - Docket, #9 Exhibit H - 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91877, #10 Exhibit I - Docket, #11 Exhibit J - Complaint, #12 Exhibit K - 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104020, #13 Exhibit L - Motion for Continuance, #14 Exhibit M - Motion, #15 Exhibit N - Motion for Continuance, #16 Exhibit O - Notice of Appeal, #17 Exhibit P - 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33063, #18 Exhibit Q - Motion for Extension of Time, #19 Exhibit R - Order, #20 Exhibit S - Notice of Appeal, #21 Exhibit T - Complaint)(Wentz, Amy) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., Other Affiliate AT&T Inc. for Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by Ohio Bell Telephone Company. (Wentz, Amy) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (Y,A) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV-19-913317 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $400, receipt number 0647-9292120. Filer has indicated that case may be related to terminated civil action 1:17-cv-0898 / 1:17-cv-1815. Filed by Rick Plant, James Tench, Randall L. Stephenson, AT&T Corp., Sandra Moreno, Janice King, Willilam Blase, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summonses, #3 Exhibit C - Docket, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wentz, Amy) |
Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Notice by Clerk that Ohio Bell Telephone Company failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (Y,A) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.