Shelton v. Energy 95, LLC
| James E. Shelton |
| Energy 95, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01024 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Opposition to #5 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by James E. Shelton. (Reo, Bryan) |
Order [non-document] granting in part Plaintiff's #6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time to file response/reply to Defendant's #5 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim until 6/30/2019. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. on 5/31/2019.(R,Sh)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 7/8/2019 to file response/reply to #5 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, with proposed order, filed by Plaintiff James E. Shelton. Related document(s) #5 . (Reo, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Defendant Energy 95, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Renewal Certification Application for Competitive Retail Natural Gas Suppliers, #2 Exhibit 2 - Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Renewal Certificate)(Krueger, David) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Energy 95, LLC. (Krueger, David) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to Notice of Removal, - Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Energy 95, LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Krueger, David) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas, case number CV-19-914241 Filing Fee Paid $400.00. Receipt No. 0647-9297036. Filed by Energy 95, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2- Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Krueger, David) |
| Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court. Attorney notified and they expect to file it on 5/8/2016. Related document(s) #1 . (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shelton v. Energy 95, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Energy 95, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Nora K. Cook |
| Represented By: | David M. Krueger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James E. Shelton | |
| Represented By: | Bryan A. Reo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
