Green v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Carl Green |
Federal Bureau of Prisons |
1:2019cv01092 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Christopher A Boyko |
Thomas M Parker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Order: Given the effective date of the government's obligation to recalculate good-time credits, the court DENIES Petitioner Green's request for interim release as premature. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 6/4/2019. (D,JJ) |
Filing 6 Opposition to Releasing Petitioner on Bond filed by Federal Bureau of Prisons. Related document(s) #4 .(Feran, Edward) |
Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Edward F. Feran filed by on behalf of Federal Bureau of Prisons. (Feran, Edward) |
Filing 4 Order: On or before May 29, 2019, the government must file a position statement on releasing petitioner on bond while his claim is pending. On or before June 12, 2019, the government must file a responsive brief on the merits of petitioner's request relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241, including his demand for a recalculation of his good time credits. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 5/22/2019. (D,JJ) |
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), #2 Supplement to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), and #4 Order, was mailed to Justin Herdman, U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Ohio, 801 W. Superior Ave, Suite 400, Cleveland OH 44113, and to United States Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001 on 5/22/2019. (D,JJ) |
Filing 3 Order referring case to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker for report and recommendation as to petition for writ of habeas corpus (Related doc #'s #1 , #2 ) and pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/21/2019. (H,CM) |
Filing 2 Supplement to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) - Memorandum in Support of Motion for Good-Time Credits Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Carl Green. Related document(s) #1 . (Lazarus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody pursuant to First Step Act of 2018. Filing fee paid. $5.00. Receipt # 14660114272. Filed by Carl Green. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (B,R) |
Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (B,R) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Green v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
Represented By: | Edward F. Feran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Carl Green | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey B. Lazarus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.