United States of America v. $9,265.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $9,265.00 in U.S. Currency
Interested Party: Dijonn Green
Case Number: 1:2019cv01446
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Boyko
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Case Management Conference with telephonic conference to be held on 9/19/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Christopher A. Boyko. This Court requires the participation of lead counsel. Counsel for plaintiff is to set up the call by calling Chambers with all counsel on the line at 216-357-7151 or providing call-in information to all counsel and the Court. Parties shall be available by phone, if needed. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Report of the Parties Planning Meeting, #2 Consent Package)(D, I)
July 3, 2019 Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Dijonn Green on 6/27/2019, filed on behalf of United States of America Related document(s) #1 . (S,KM)
June 25, 2019 Filing 3 Department of the Treasury Return. $9,265 U.S. Currency seized on February 25, 2019 by Homeland Security Investigations filed by United States of America. Related document(s) #2 . (P,WL)
June 24, 2019 Filing 2 Warrant of Arrest in Rem for $9,265.00 in U.S. Currency issued on 6/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Department of Treasury Process Receipt and Return) (B,R)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint in Forfeiture against $9,265.00 in U.S. Currency.. Filing fee exempt. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Praecipe, #3 Warrant of Arrest in Rem, #4 Process and Return TD90 CBP, #5 Notice to Potential Claimant) (Morford, James)
June 24, 2019 Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (B,R)
June 24, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (B,R)
June 24, 2019 Service by Clerk. Notice and Complaint of Forefiture addressed to Dijonn Green placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70140150000158886644. (Y,A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $9,265.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $9,265.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Dijonn Green
Represented By: Jennifer Yobe Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: James L. Morford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?