Tyree v. Cuyahoga County et al
| Cortez Tyree |
| Correctional Officer Clemens, Correctional Officer Dunn, Correctional Officer Baker, Cuyahoga County, Unnamed Defendants 1-5 and Unnamed Defendants |
| 1:2019cv01533 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by Cortez Tyree. Correctional Officer Baker waiver sent on 7/26/2019, answer due 9/24/2019; Correctional Officer Clemens waiver sent on 7/26/2019, answer due 9/24/2019; Cuyahoga County waiver sent on 7/26/2019, answer due 9/24/2019; Correctional Officer Dunn waiver sent on 7/26/2019, answer due 9/24/2019 filed on behalf of Cortez Tyree (Greene, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons not provided and were not issued. (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (B,R) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9400329.. Filed by Cortez Tyree. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit ODRC Bureau of Adult Detention Report, #2 Exhibit USMS Report, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Greene, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
