Noco Company v. Triplenetpricing LLC
Noco Company |
Triplenetpricing LLC and Triplenet Pricing, Inc. |
1:2019cv01550 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
John R Adams |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Marginal Entry Order that this action is dismissed voluntarily with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Judge John R. Adams on 7/17/19. (K,C) |
Filing 4 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Noco Company. (Malone, Sean) |
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Triplenetpricing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (Y,A) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Triplenetpricing LLC and Triplenet Pricing Inc. Filing fee paid $400. Receipt number 0647-9403036. Filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reseller Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Cease and Desist Letter, #3 Exhibit C - Settlement Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Online Listing, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons) (Pinney, Jon) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (Y,A) |
Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.