Sherwin-Williams Company v. Sapient Corporation
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Sherwin-Williams Company |
Sapient Corporation fka Rosetta Marketing Group, LLC dba Sapientrazorfish, Sapient Corporation, Sapient Corporation formerly known as Rosetta Marketing Group, LLC doing business as Sapientrazorfish and Rosetta Marketing Group, LLC |
1:2019cv01610 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Jonathan D Greenberg |
Solomon Oliver |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 18 Proposed Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Sherwin-Williams Company. (Bacon, Brett) |
|
|
LAST NOTICE: Prepare now and avoid delays logging in later. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [OHND] will be upgrading CM/ECF to the Next Generation of CM/ECF [NextGen] on February 10, 2020. In order to complete our final transition to NextGen, CM/ECF will be offline starting at 12:00 noon on Friday, February 7, 2020, through 11:59 p.m. Sunday, February 9, 2020. Pursuant to General Order 2020-02, we have established an email box, nextgenfilings@ohnd.uscourts.gov, for submitting documents to be filed during this period.Preparing for NextGen is a two-step process. Step one was to obtain or upgrade your PACER account. Each attorney should have their own individual upgraded PACER account at this time. Step two will be to link your upgraded PACER account to your OHND e-filing account in the NextGen CM/ECF system on or after February 10, 2020. # Linking Instructions. You will be unable to e-file until the accounts are linked. If you have any additional questions, please call the Clerk's Office Help Desk at 1-800-355-8498. (SL) (ADI) |
Filing 16 Joint Motion to reschedule the March 4, 2020 date for early neutral evaluation and to adjust the corresponding date for submission of written evaluation statements filed by Plaintiff Sherwin-Williams Company. (Bacon, Brett) |
|
Filing 15 Attorney Appearance by Angela Daling Lydon filed by on behalf of Sherwin-Williams Company. (Lydon, Angela) |
Filing 14 Attorney Appearance by Lindsey Carr Siegler filed by on behalf of Sherwin-Williams Company. (Siegler, Lindsey) |
Filing 13 Motion by Gregory R. Farkas to withdraw as attorney filed by Plaintiff Sherwin-Williams Company. (Farkas, Gregory) |
|
IMPORTANT: Prepare now and avoid delays logging in later. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio [OHND] will be upgrading CM/ECF to the Next Generation of CM/ECF [NextGen] on February 10, 2020. Information regarding NextGen can be found # on the court's website.Preparing for NextGen CM/ECF is a multi-step process. Step one is to obtain or upgrade your PACER account. Currently, attorneys within a firm may share a PACER account. This will not be allowed with NextGen. Each attorney must have their own upgraded PACER account. If you are using a shared PACER account, register for a new PACER account by clicking # here.If you have an upgraded PACER account for another NextGen court or your PACER account was created after August 10, 2014, no further action is required at this time. If neither applies, you must upgrade your legacy PACER account. If this is not done, you will be unable to e-file after February 10, 2020. Instructions for linking your PACER account to your CM/ECF account will be sent in February. If you still have questions, please contact the PACER Service Center at 800-676-6854 or the Clerk's Office Help Desk at 1-800-355-8498. (SL) (ADI) |
|
|
Filing 10 Motion for attorney Scott Elmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. with Supporting Declaration Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-9702499, filed by Defendant Sapient Corporation. (Mordue, Brandon) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/6/2020: #1 Signed Declaration) (B,R). |
Filing 9 Motion for attorney Michael Dockterman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. with Supporting Declaration Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-9702483, filed by Defendant Sapient Corporation. (Mordue, Brandon) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/6/2020: #1 Signed Declaration) (B,R). |
Filing 8 Attorney Appearance by Brandon G. Mordue filed by on behalf of Sapient Corporation. (Mordue, Brandon) |
Filing 7 Attorney Appearance by Philip S. Kushner filed by on behalf of Sapient Corporation. (Kushner, Philip) |
|
Filing 6 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Sapient Corporation on 7/16/2019, filed on behalf of Sherwin-Williams Company (Bacon, Brett) |
Filing 5 Original Summons issued to counsel for service upon Sapient Corporation. (B,R) |
Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Sapient Corporation c/o CT Corporation System. (B,R) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/16/2019: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R). |
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case, (B,R) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (B,R) |
Filing 3 Praecipe for issuance of Original Summons filed by The Sherwin-Williams Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Bacon, Brett) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by The Sherwin-Williams Company. (Bacon, Brett) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Sapient Corporation. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9416515. Filed by Sherwin-Williams Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bacon, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.