Southern Ohio Sand Co. v. ProFrac Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Southern Ohio Sand Co.
Defendant: ProFrac Services, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv01686
Filed: July 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Boyko
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by ProFrac Services, LLC. (Akers, Patrick)
September 10, 2019 Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint , Counterclaim against Southern Ohio Sand Co. filed by ProFrac Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit MPA, #2 Exhibit Letter Agreement, #3 Exhibit Correspondence, #4 Exhibit Amendment 1 to Letter Agreement)(Akers, Patrick)
August 22, 2019 Filing 6 Notice of Case Management Conference with case management conference to be held on 11/14/2019 at 11:30 AM in Chambers 15B. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Report of the Parties Planning Meeting, #2 Consent Package)(D, I)
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Plead in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. ProFrac Services, LLC answer due 9/10/2019. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/14/2019.(D, I)
August 13, 2019 Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 9/10/2019 to answer , move or otherwise Plead in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant ProFrac Services, LLC. Related document #1 . (Lampley, Nathaniel)
August 9, 2019 Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon ProFrac Services, LLC on 7/30/2019, filed on behalf of Southern Ohio Sand Co. Related document(s) #3 . (W,CM)
July 25, 2019 Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to ProFrac Services, LLC placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 70162140000102826417. (Y,A)
July 24, 2019 Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon ProFrac Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (Y,A)
July 24, 2019 Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case, (Y,A)
July 24, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (Y,A)
July 23, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Southern Ohio Sand Co. (Cardone, Thomas)
July 23, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against ProFrac Services, LLC. Filing fee paid $400. Receipt number 0647-9432542. Filed by Southern Ohio Sand Co. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cardone, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southern Ohio Sand Co. v. ProFrac Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Southern Ohio Sand Co.
Represented By: Thomas E. Cardone
Represented By: Ian H. Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ProFrac Services, LLC
Represented By: Patrick R. Akers
Represented By: Nathaniel Lampley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?