Pinecrest Apartments, Ltd. v. Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC et al
| Pinecrest Apartments, Ltd. |
| CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc., Commercial Industrial Building Owners and Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE |
| 1:2019cv01953 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 11-15-19 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc., Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE. (Wilson, Holly) |
Order [non-document] Defendants' #10 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 11-15-19 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint. CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc. answer due 11/15/2019; Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE answer due 11/15/2019. Approved by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 10/11/2019.(K,K)
|
| Filing 9 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE on 9/4/2019, filed on behalf of Pinecrest Apartments, Ltd. Related document(s) #3 . (Truax, Philip) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Munich Reinsurance Company for Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE filed by Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE. (Wilson, Holly) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Commercial Industrial Building Owners Alliance, Inc. for CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc. filed by CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc.. (Wilson, Holly) |
|
Filing 6
Order granting #5 Defendant's Motion for extension of time until October 18, 2019 to answer. CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc. answer due 10/18/2019; Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE answer due 10/18/2019. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 9/20/2019.(W,CM)
|
| Filing 5 Motion for extension of time until October 18, 2019 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc., Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Wilson, Holly) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc. on 8/30/2019, filed on behalf of Pinecrest Apartments, Ltd. Related document(s) #3 . (Truax, Philip) |
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc., Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE, Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE, et al c/o Thomas M. Dawson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Pinecrest Apartments, Ltd.. (Truax, Philip) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand For Declaratory Judgment, Breach of Contract, And Bad Faith against CIBA Insurance Services of California, Inc., Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9489426. Filed by Pinecrest Apartments, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Commercial Lines Declarations Page, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3Summons, #4 Supplement Corporate Disclosure Statement(to be refiled) (Truax, Philip) |
| Judge Dan Aaron Polster assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
