Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc., et al. v. LeBrun
Plaintiff: Indusco Group, Inc. and Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Alfred LeBrun
Case Number: 1:2019cv02100
Filed: September 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: James S Gwin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2019 Filing 7 Certification of Counsel Pursuant to Civ. R. 65 filed by All Plaintiffs. (Caspary, Christopher)
September 12, 2019 Filing 6 Motion Expedited Discovery filed by Indusco Group, Inc., Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Expedited Discovery to Defendant, #3 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Deposition of Defendant Alfred LeBrun III, #4 Proposed Order)(Caspary, Christopher)
September 12, 2019 Filing 5 Ex Parte Motion for temporary restraining order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Indusco Group, Inc., Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Caspary, Christopher)
September 12, 2019 Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not provided, therefore were not issued. (Y,A)
September 12, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (Y,A)
September 12, 2019 Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case, (Y,A)
September 12, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by The Indusco Group, Inc.. (Caspary, Christopher)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc.. (Caspary, Christopher)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand for Temporary Restraining Order (Ex Parte), Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, and Other Relief against Alfred LeBrun. Filing fee paid $400, receipt number 0647-9520164. Filed by Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc., The Indusco Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - LeBrun NDNC, #3 Exhibit 2 - Itinerary 1.15.15, #4 Exhibit 3 - Itinerary 4.8.15, #5 Exhibit 4 - Itinerary 11.2.15, #6 Exhibit 5 - Itinerary 1.23.17, #7 Exhibit 6 - 5.22.19 resignation letter, #8 Exhibit 7 - LeBrun Cease and Desist, #9 Exhibit 8 - FedEx delivery confirmation, #10 Exhibit 9 - Tanya email 8.7.19, #11 Exhibit 10 - PLS Text) (Zashin, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc., et al. v. LeBrun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Indusco Group, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen S. Zashin
Represented By: Christopher D. Caspary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mazzella Lifting Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen S. Zashin
Represented By: Christopher D. Caspary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alfred LeBrun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?