Ford v. D'Antoni et al
| Rodney Ford |
| James A. Mitarotonda, Steven W. Percy, Anne P. Noonan, OMNOVA Solutions Inc., Larry B. Porcellato, Joseph M. Gingo, Janet Plaut Giesselman, David J. D'Antoni, William R. Seelbach, Michael J Merriman and Allan R. Rothwell |
| 1:2019cv02150 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Stipulation and Order that Plaintiff's individual claims are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Judge John R. Adams on 11/22/19. (K,C)
|
| Filing 3 Proposed Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice and Proposed Order filed by Rodney Ford. (Camillus, John) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. Summons were not provided and were not issued. (B,R) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (B,R) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Verified Derivative and Class Action Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-9527929, filed by Rodney Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Camillus, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
