Blair v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Nathaniel Blair |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv02244 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| John R Adams |
| Kathleen B Burke |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by Personal Service executed upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney on 10/1/2019; and served via FedEx on the U.S. Attorney General on 10/2/2019 and Office of Regional Chief Counsel on 10/02/2019 filed on behalf of Nathaniel Blair. Related document(s) #7 . (P,G) |
| Filing 7 Original Summons, Complaint and Magistrate Judge's Initial Order issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (P,G) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (P,G) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Defendant's Answer, the transcript of the administrative record and the parties' briefs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 16.3.1, including but not limited to the schedule set forth in that Rule. Any requests for an extension of time shall be filed at least five days prior to the due date for filing. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 9/27/2019. (Attachment #1 Rule 16.3.1) (P,G). |
Filing 4
Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 9/27/2019.(P,G)
|
| Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (S,SR) |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Nathaniel Blair. (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Nathaniel Blair. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to SSA, #3 Summons to Atty General, #4 Summons to Asst. US Atty for ND of OH, #5 USM-285 to SSA, #6 USM-285 to Atty General, #7 USM-285 to Atty for ND of OH) (Wilson, Rachel) |
| Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 9/27/2019. (S,SR) |
| Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blair v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Ruchi Vikram Asher |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathaniel Blair | |
| Represented By: | Rachel C. Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
