Fry v. Shoop
| Clarence Fry |
| Warden Timothy Shoop |
| 1:2019cv02307 |
| October 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Attorney Appearance by Brenda S. Leikala filed by on behalf of Timothy Shoop. (Leikala, Brenda)
|
|
Filing 9
Time Line filed by Clarence Fry. Related document(s) #8 .(Rigby, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 8
Order As set forth in this order, to determine the statute of limitations expiration date in this matter, counsel must submit the attached Time Line. Although this Court will make its own determination of the limitations expiration date, it remains at all times the responsibility of counsel for petitioner to make his own estimation as to when the statute of limitations period will expire, and file a timely habeas petition accordingly. Counsel must submit this Time Line as soon as possible but no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Timeline)(L,Ja)
|
|
Filing 7
Marginal Entry Order granting Petitioner's Motion for appointment of counsel (Related Doc #3 ). Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/4/2019.(L,Ja)
|
|
Filing 6
Marginal Entry Order granting Petetitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/4/2019.(L,Ja)
|
|
Filing 5
Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/3/19. (Y,A)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Filing of Civil Cover Sheet filed by Clarence Fry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hicks, Sharon)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion with Memorandum in Support for appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff Clarence Fry. (Hicks, Sharon)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Clarence Fry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Prisioner's Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B. Accounting Statement)(Hicks, Sharon)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Intent to File Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Clarence Fry. (Hicks, Sharon)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (Y,A)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case, (Y,A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fry v. Shoop | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden Timothy Shoop | |
| Represented By: | Brenda S. Leikala |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clarence Fry | |
| Represented By: | Sharon A. Hicks |
| Represented By: | Kimberly S. Rigby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
