Noco Company v. Eagle Leather, Inc.
Noco Company |
Eagle Leather, Inc. |
1:2019cv02316 |
October 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Marginal Entry Order Plaintiff Noco Company's Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) with prejudice is approved. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/12/2019. (L,Ja) |
Filing 8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Noco Company. (Malone, Sean) |
Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 12/9/2019 at 01:15 PM at Chambers 16A. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting)(L,Ja) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Package Issued by Courtroom Deputy. (L,Ja) |
Order [non-document]granting #5 Defendant Eagle Leather, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for leave to Move, Plead or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Eagle Leather, Inc. answer is due 12/5/2019. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 11/5/2019.(L,Ja) |
Filing 5 Motion for leave to Move, Plead or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Unopposed) filed by Defendant Eagle Leather, Inc.. Related document(s) #1 . (Kunselman, David) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Eagle Leather, Inc. on 10/15/2019, filed on behalf of Noco Company. Related document(s) #3 (S,AN) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Eagle Leather, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7018 3090 0000 3223 6288. (S,AN) |
Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Eagle Leather, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (Y,A) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (Y,A) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Noco Company. (Pinney, Jon) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Eagle Leather, Inc. Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 0647-9558110. Filed by Noco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Reseller Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's Sales on Amazon, #3 Exhibit C - Cease and Desist Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons) (Pinney, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Noco Company v. Eagle Leather, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Noco Company | |
Represented By: | Jon J. Pinney |
Represented By: | Sean P. Malone |
Represented By: | David R. Posteraro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eagle Leather, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David A. Kunselman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.