Najar v. Turner
Petitioner: Nabil Najar
Respondent: Warden Neil Turner
Case Number: 1:2019cv02377
Filed: October 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: John R Adams
Referring Judge: Kathleen B Burke
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2019 Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) mailed to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost at 30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215; Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order, and #5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order mailed to Warden at North Central Correctional Complex, 670 Marion-Williamsport Road, Marion, OH 43302 and to Petitioner at North Central Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 1812, Marion, Ohio 43301. (S,HR)
October 18, 2019 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order: Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse). Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 10/18/19. (S,HR)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order granting Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Judge John R. Adams on 10/17/19.(K,C).
October 17, 2019 Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge John R. Adams on 10/17/19. (K,C)
October 17, 2019 Copy of #4 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to Nabil Najar at Marion Correctional on 10/18/19. Related document(s) #4 . (K,C)
October 11, 2019 Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (Y,A)
October 11, 2019 Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Nabil Najar. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Prisoner)(Y,A)
October 11, 2019 Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Nabil Najar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Page 1) (Y,A)
October 11, 2019 Copy of #3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) mailed to Nabil Najar at P.O. Box 1812, Marion, OH 43301 on 10/11/19. Related document(s) #3 , #1 . (Y,A)
October 11, 2019 Judge John R. Adams assigned to case, (Y,A)
October 11, 2019 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke. (Y,A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Najar v. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nabil Najar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Neil Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?