Scheall v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Robert E. Scheall
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv02435
Filed: October 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Boyko
Referring Judge: Thomas M Parker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return of Service by U.S. Marshal by personal executed upon U.S. Attorney on 10/21/2019; Commissioner of Social Security Administration by FedEx on 10/24/2019 and upon Attorney General by FedEx on 10/23/2019 filed on behalf of Robert E. Scheall Related document(s) #6 . (W,CM)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Certificate of Notice Pursuant to Magistrate Order filed by Robert E. Scheall. (Davis, Bradley)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Original Summons, Complaint, Initial Order and Magistrate Consent Package issued to U.S. Marshal for service upon Commissioner of Social Security c/o the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (Attachments: #1 USM-285). (D,JJ)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Magistrate Consent Package issued. (D,JJ)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/18/2019. (D,JJ)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Robert E. Scheall. Related document(s) #1 . (Davis, Bradley)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Robert E. Scheall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 praecipe, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 USM-285) (Davis, Bradley)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 10/18/2019. (L,MI)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (L,MI)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/18/2019. (D,JJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scheall v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Lynne H. Buck
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E. Scheall
Represented By: Bradley J. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?