Stephens v. Reimer Law Co.
Charles L. Stephens |
Reimer Law Co. |
1:2019cv02444 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Patricia A Gaughan |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order and Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)A(ii) is So Ordered. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/9/19. (LC,S) re #8 |
Filing 8 Joint Proposed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)A(ii) filed by Charles L. Stephens. (Dann, Marc) |
Order [non-document]: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer or Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint is Granted to 12/9/19. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/14/19. (LC,S) re #7 |
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until December 9, 2019 to answer or Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Reimer Law Co.. (Brown, Lori) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Reimer Law Co.. (Brown, Lori) |
Filing 5 Attorney Appearance by Lori E. Brown filed by on behalf of Reimer Law Co.. (Brown, Lori) |
Filing 4 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference set on 12/17/2019 at 08:45 AM to be held telephonically by Hon. Patricia A. Gaughan. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/05/19. (D,Ma) |
Filing 3 Return of Service by personal service executed upon Reimer Law Co. on 10/28/2019, filed on behalf of Charles L. Stephens Related document(s) #1 . (Dann, Marc) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Reimer Law Co. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (Y,A) |
Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case, (Y,A) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (Y,A) |
Filing 1 Complaint for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Ohio Consumer Sales Practice Act with jury demand against Reimer Law Co. Filing fee paid $400, receipt number 0647-9583240. Filed by Charles L. Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Docket, #2 Exhibit 2-Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3-Affidavit, #4 Exhibit 4-Motion for Summary Judgment, #5 Exhibit 5-Everbank POC, #6 Exhibit 6-FC Complaint, #7 Exhibit 7-Leave to file Amended Complaint, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summons Reimer) (Dann, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stephens v. Reimer Law Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles L. Stephens | |
Represented By: | Marc E. Dann |
Represented By: | Brian D. Flick |
Represented By: | Whitney E. Kaster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Reimer Law Co. | |
Represented By: | Lori E. Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.