Chime et al v. Family Life Counseling & Psychiatric Services
| John Chime and Bethany Chime |
| Family Life Counseling & Psychiatric Services |
| 1:2019cv02513 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 1-10-2020 to answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Family Life Counseling & Psychiatric Services. Related document(s) #1 . (Krol, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. All Defendants filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Levine, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Family Life Counseling & Psychiatric Services. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Plaintiffs. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-9596094. Filed by John Chime, Bethany Chime. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Party Plaintiff Signatures, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Levine, Bradley) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (B,R) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case, (B,R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
